Re: Support for sslverify

Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> - There doesn't seem to be any way to push the verify mode down to the
>>> backup/backupall/backupglobals/restore dialogues, or to the debugger
>>> (which, annoyingly, still has it's own connection class). Do we want
>>> to re-verify in those places, or just set verify=none, as we've
>>> already verified at initial connection? I guess in theory a mitm
>>> attack could start after we initially connect.
>> Ick. I'll need to look into that. We must absolutely verify every
>> connection, anything else is very stupid.

This look better?

(I haven't actually tested the backup stuff :-P But it builds..)

I also noticed we have windows linebreaks in at least one file in the
debugger directory...

//Magnus