Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Scott Carey" <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: 2009-03-13 15:55:30
Message-ID: 49BA3BA2.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> wrote:
> usr sys wt idl sze
> 38 11 0 50 64

The fact that you're maxing out at 50% CPU utilization has me
wondering -- are there really 64 CPUs here, or are there 32 CPUs with
"hyperthreading" technology (or something conceptually similar)?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-03-13 16:18:19 Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Previous Message Alan Stange 2009-03-13 15:20:04 Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4