| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel restore fixes |
| Date: | 2009-03-10 01:44:50 |
| Message-ID: | 49B5C612.90505@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, why bother with init_dump_utils at all?
>>>
>
>
>> Well, the Windows reference I have suggests TlsAlloc() needs to be
>> called early in the initialisation process ...
>>
>
> How early is early? The proposed call sites for init_dump_utils seem
> already long past the point where any libc-level infrastructure would
> think it is "initialization" time.
>
Well, I think at least it needs to be done where other threads won't be
calling it at the same time.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dickson S. Guedes | 2009-03-10 01:54:11 | Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-03-10 01:33:51 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |