From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Matteo Beccati" <php(at)beccati(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4689: Expanding the length of a VARCHAR column should not induce a table rewrite |
Date: | 2009-03-05 19:46:22 |
Message-ID: | 49AFD7AE.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
>>> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> ALTER TABLE ... TYPE does cause a table rewrite even if new_type =
> old_type, and that is actually useful...
> for example when you add a fillfactor to an existing table that
> fillfactor will not affect the existing data until you rewrite the
> table and a convenient way is exactly using ALTER TABLE ... TYPE.
I find that to be exactly as useful as it would be to have a table
rewrite if I added a new null-capable column, and somewhat less useful
than it would be have a table rewrite on dropping a column.
Maintaining the function of this clever trick should not be the basis
of imposing a burden on relatively common maintenance operations.
> now, back to the problem... is not easier to define a column as TEXT
> and to put a check to constraint the length? if you wanna change the
> constraint that will be almost free
Thanks for the interesting suggestion. I'm not sure I'd want to go
there for various reasons; but even if I wanted to go that route, how
would I modify that constraint without causing the whole table to be
scanned for compliance?
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-03-05 19:49:48 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4689: Expanding the length of a VARCHAR column should not induce a table rewrite |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-03-05 19:26:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4689: Expanding the length of a VARCHAR column should not induce a table rewrite |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | André Volpato | 2009-03-05 19:47:58 | Re: cbrt() broken in AIX |
Previous Message | André Volpato | 2009-03-05 19:41:49 | Re: cbrt() broken in AIX |