| From: | Linos <info(at)linos(dot)es> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TCP network cost |
| Date: | 2009-03-01 17:57:03 |
| Message-ID: | 49AACC6F.7080809@linos.es |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Linos <info(at)linos(dot)es> writes:
>> Hello, i have been having a problem like this in debian machines and i have
>> discovered that (almost in my case), the problem only arises when i am using
>> "ssl = true" in postgresql.conf although i am using clear tcp connections to
>> localhost to perform my query, if i disable ssl in configuration my localhost
>> query times goes from 4200ms to 110ms,
>
> Does that number include connection startup overhead? (If it doesn't,
> it'd be pretty strange.) Ross's problem is not about startup overhead,
> unless I've misread him completely.
>
> regards, tom lane
This difference it is from the runtime of the query, i get this with \timing
parameter in psql, it is from a table that have 300 small png (one for every row
in table) on a bytea column but the problem grows with any large result anyway,
i have attacted pcap files in general list but the differences are like this:
ssl enabled:
`psql -d database`: SELECT * FROM TABLE (110 ms with \timing)
`psql -d database -h localhost`: SELECT * FROM TABLE (4200 ms with \timing)
ssl disabled:
`psql -d database`: SELECT * FROM TABLE (110 ms with \timing)
`psql -d database -h localhost`: SELECT * FROM TABLE (120 ~ 130 ms with \timing)
Anyway i dont know if this apply to Ross problem but reading his post and after
see that he is using debian and have problem with speed on tcp localhost i
suppose that maybe have the same problem.
Regards,
Miguel Angel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-01 18:10:00 | Re: TCP network cost |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-01 17:43:18 | Re: TCP network cost |