From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3) |
Date: | 2009-02-27 12:19:26 |
Message-ID: | 49A7DA4E.7090004@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote:
> This isn't the first time we've run into the problem that we've run
> out of signals. I think we need to multiplex all our event signals
> onto a single signal and use some other mechanism to indicate the type
> of message.
Yeah. A patch to do that was discussed a while ago, as Fujii's
synchronous replication patch bumped into that as well. I don't feel
like changing the signaling so dramatically right now, however.
> Do we really need a "promote to master" message at all? Is pg_standby
> responsible for this or could the master write out the configuration
> changes necessary itself?
The way pg_standby works is that it keeps waiting for new WAL files to
arrive, until it's told to stop and return a non-zero exit code.
Non-zero exit code from restore_command basically means "file not
found", making the startup process to end recovery and start up the
database. There's two ways to tell pg_standby to stop: create a trigger
file with a particular name, or signal it with SIGINT or SIGQUIT.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-02-27 12:50:49 | Patch for not going beyond NOFILE system limit (updated) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-02-27 12:14:34 | Re: BUG #4680: Server crashed if using wrong (mismatch) conversion functions |