From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RE: [HACKERS] Kerberos V5 required for PostgreSQL installation on Windows |
Date: | 2009-02-27 09:39:23 |
Message-ID: | 49A7B4CB.3080405@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT
> <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> wrote:
>> We should delayload this dll since it is only needed
>> for specific configuration. No need to install when it is not used.
>
> That would require building knowledge of DLL names into the code,
> which isn't practical as some projects have a habit of changing them
> regularly (e.g. gettext).
Are you sure?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hf3f62bz.aspx
seems to indicate that you can do it on just the commandline if you want to?
(I haven't tried it so I don't know if it's actually doable)
> I'm not sure why Dann would see this problem - all our installers
> include the required DLLs, and they should also be in the
> binaries-no-installer packages. If he's built the binary himself, then
> he obviously has the import libraries for Kerberos, so where are the
> DLLs?
That is also a valid question, though.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-02-27 09:47:28 | Re: RE: [HACKERS] Kerberos V5 required for PostgreSQL installation on Windows |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2009-02-27 09:34:08 | Re: Question about no unchanging update rule + ALTER |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-02-27 09:47:28 | Re: RE: [HACKERS] Kerberos V5 required for PostgreSQL installation on Windows |
Previous Message | Frank Featherlight | 2009-02-27 09:13:45 | Re: Service not starting: Error 1053 |