From: | Michael Akinde <michael(dot)akinde(at)met(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Large object loading stalls |
Date: | 2009-02-24 10:18:09 |
Message-ID: | 49A3C961.7070503@met.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Akinde <michael(dot)akinde(at)met(dot)no> writes:
>
>> Anyway - the situation now is that just the loading process is hanging
>> on the server, with an <IDLE> in transaction. But it is definitely the
>> loading program that is hanging, not the Postgres server.
>>
>
> What the stack traces seem to show is that both the client and the
> server are waiting for each other to send some data. Which means
> somebody's bollixed the protocol.
>
> In the past we've seen this type of thing caused by multithreaded
> client programs in which more than one thread tried to use the same
> PGconn object without adequate interlocking. libpq itself does not
> provide any threading guards --- if you want more than one thread
> accessing a PGconn then it's up to you to use a mutex or something
> to serialize them. Is it possible this case applies here?
>
My apologies for the delayed response.
Our application is single-threaded, so it seems unlikely that we are
running into a problem with that.
The only thing I can think of right now, is that we are running a
Postgres 8.3 on Debian Etch (so a backported debian package), whereas
the libraries linked into our application are older library version
(libpq4 and libpqxx 2.6.8). I'll try to upgrade the OS to a version with
"native" support for 8.3 and up to date (or at least more up to date)
versions of pq, pqxx and check whether the tests still break down.
Regards,
Michael A.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
michael.akinde.vcf | text/x-vcard | 287 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 野村 | 2009-02-24 10:55:29 | Re: javascript and postgres |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-24 09:17:10 | Re: High cpu usage after many inserts |