Re: parallel restore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-02-21 01:19:05
Message-ID: 499F5689.50400@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> There is an unfinished TODO item here: we really ought to make it work
>>> for tar-format archives. That's probably not hugely difficult, but
>>> I didn't look into it, and don't think we should hold up applying the
>>> existing patch for it.
>>>
>
>
>> Right. Were you thinking this should be done for 8.4?
>>
>
> If you have time to look into it, sure. Otherwise we should just put it
> on the TODO list.
>
>
>

I've had a look at this. If our tar code supported out of order
restoration(using fseeko) I'd be done. But it doesn't, and I won't get
that done for 8.4, if at all. I'm not sure what would be involved in
making it work.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-02-21 02:15:16 Re: The science of optimization in practical terms?
Previous Message decibel 2009-02-21 00:25:41 Re: The science of optimization in practical terms?