Re: UPDATE

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: c k <shreeseva(dot)learning(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UPDATE
Date: 2009-02-19 15:06:01
Message-ID: 499D7559.1060904@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

c k wrote:
> I am using PG on windows for development. While testing some queries I
> found that updates are much slower as compared to other database
> systems. (On avarage MySQL updates 4-5 times faster than PG in a single
> unique index on primary key) Why?

Is your MySQL instance using MyISAM tables, or InnoDB?

> Another thing that I noticed is when any single column in a table is
> updated and having no index many (in my case 7) indexes on different
> columns, It takes about 180-200 secs. But when any single column in a
> table is updated and having many (in my case 7) indexes on different
> columns, but does not have index on the column that is being updated, It
> takes about 800-900 secs. Why?

Perhaps you can show us some table definitions and queries with EXPLAIN
ANALYZE output? Your explanation is quite difficult to understand.

> What can be done for such updates to make them faster?

Faster disks :-P

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

  • UPDATE at 2009-02-19 13:15:04 from c k

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-02-19 15:18:46 Re: UPDATE
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-19 15:03:35 Re: \l of psql 8.4 looks ... unreadable on 80char default