From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WIP: hooking parser |
Date: | 2009-02-18 15:05:03 |
Message-ID: | 499C239F.7070706@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/2/16 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Next sample of parser hook using:
>>> attachment contains module that transform every empty string to null.
>>> I am not sure, if this behave is exactly compatible with Oracle,
>> Surely a parser hook like this would have nothing whatsoever to do
>> with Oracle's behavior.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
> it's maybe too much simple :). It is sample that have to show possibility.
I'd be quite interested to support some kind of hook to deal with this
Oracle null issue. It would be a great help for porting projects.
However, doing this properly is probably more complex and needs further
thought. I'd suggest writing a type of regression test first for Oracle
null behavior and then evaluating any kind of hook or hack against that.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-02-18 15:13:44 | Re: The science of optimization in practical terms? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-02-18 14:57:41 | Re: SIMILAR TO bug? |