From: | Edoardo Panfili <edoardo(at)aspix(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: can't figure string compare result (using also custom C function) |
Date: | 2009-02-14 08:59:39 |
Message-ID: | 499687FB.7090503@aspix.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sam Mason ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:31:49PM +0100, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
>> SELECT idSpecie,nome FROM specienomi
>> WHERE idspecie=37026 and nome='X Agropogon littoralis (Sm.) C.E. Hubb.';
>> idspecie | nome
>> ----------+-----------------------------------------
>> 37026 | X Agropogon littoralis (Sm.) C.E. Hubb.
>>
>> The same query but without one condition: no results.
>>
>> SELECT idSpecie,nome FROM specienomi
>> WHERE nome='X Agropogon littoralis (Sm.) C.E. Hubb.';
>> idspecie | nome
>> ----------+------
>> (0 rows)
>>
>> I can't figure why, can someone tell me how investigate?
>
> I've just looked back in the archives and noticed that you were asking
> about functional indexes; you do know that if you change the definition
> of a function that PG doesn't know to rebuild the index don't you?
>
> That would exhibit the symptoms you're seeing; i.e. the first case is
> using an index on "idspecie" and the second is using the (out-of-date)
> functional index.
Tank you!
After you answer it is obvious (I have an IMMUTABLE at the and of function).
I was working with the same function using plpgsql but it is 2.5 times
slower, and plperl is slower.
REINDER TABLE specie;
and all works fine.
Is it reported on the documentation? (this is not a critic regarding
postgres very well done documentation!) I must read it with more attention.
Tank you again
Edoardo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dhanunjaya naidu yandrapu | 2009-02-14 09:40:28 | trigger creation error (tsvector_update_trigger) |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-02-14 08:44:14 | Re: temporary table problem |