From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
Date: | 2009-02-13 17:06:09 |
Message-ID: | 4995A881.9050907@esilo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> wrote:
>> Should I create a patch implementing the PQinitCrypto idea?
>
> I think that would be helpful. Seeing the code will give everyone a
> better idea of exactly what the proposed change is and whether it's
> acceptable.
>
> ...Robert
>
>
Patch attached.
One thing I noticed is the ssl_open_connections variable is ref counting
connections when pq_initssllib is true. But, it now only affects crypto
library init and cleanup calls. Point is, ref counting is only needed
if pq_initcryptolib is true and it should be renamed to
crypto_open_connections. I didn't do this in the patch. Its the same
old name and the counter is incremented if pq_initssllib or
pq_initcryptolib is true. Please advise.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
initcrypto.patch | text/plain | 6.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-13 17:20:58 | Re: [PERFORM] GIST versus GIN indexes for intarrays |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-13 16:28:28 | Re: Database corruption help |