Re: Two-phase commmit, plpgsql and plproxy

From: Igor Katson <descentspb(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, plproxy-users(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two-phase commmit, plpgsql and plproxy
Date: 2009-02-11 21:57:39
Message-ID: 499349D3.9080609@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:43 +0300, Igor Katson wrote:
>
>> ERROR: XX000: SPI_execute_plan failed executing query "PREPARE
>> TRANSACTION '2pctest'": SPI_ERROR_TRANSACTION
>>
>
> It's probably treating the word PREPARE specially. You can avoid this
> problem by using EXECUTE and specifying the command as a string.
>
>
Yes, doing an EXECUTE helped to create the function.
>> Is there a way to achieve the needed behaviour with two-phase commmit,
>> plpgsql and plproxy ?
>>
>
> You can't begin or end a transaction inside a function. If that was
> allowed, what would the function do after the transaction was prepared?
>
>
> I think you need to do PREPARE TRANSACTION separately, somehow. You
> might need to modify plproxy to do that the way you want.
>
Thanks, Jeff. That's not good news, cause I am not able to do that.

The postgres manual says, that
" The intended usage of the feature is that a prepared transaction will
normally be committed or rolled back as soon as an external transaction
manager has verified that other databases are also prepared to commit. "

So does this "external transaction manager" exist? I am not clear about
what it is.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Moreno 2009-02-11 22:09:29 Re: Saber cuando se dispara el trigger (After: insert,update,delete)
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-02-11 21:44:47 Re: Two-phase commmit, plpgsql and plproxy