| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum and reloptions |
| Date: | 2009-02-06 22:45:22 |
| Message-ID: | 498CBD82.1000308@timbira.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
>> (ii) I think we should change the expression "storage parameters" for
>> something else because autovacuum is related to maintenance. My suggestion is
>> a general expression like "relation parameters";
>
> I'm not sure I agree with this idea, because the term "storage
> parameter" has been used for several releases already. This would be a
> relatively major terminology change.
>
I don't buy your argument. 'fillfactor' is a _storage_ parameter but
'autovacuum_enabled' is not. I don't like terminology changes too but in this
case it sounds strange calling autovacuum_* as storage parameters.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-02-06 23:00:33 | Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-02-06 22:08:39 | Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN |