Scott Carey wrote:
> Sorry for the top post --
>
> Assuming Linux --
>
> 1: PERC 6 is still a bit inferior to other options, but not that bad.
> Its random IOPS is fine, sequential speeds are noticeably less than
> say the latest from Adaptec or Areca.
>
>
In the archives there was big thread about this very setup. is very
similar to mine although i'm getting close to a year old
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-03/thrd3.php#00264