| From: | Svenne Krap <svenne(at)krap(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Date: | 2009-02-04 13:05:21 |
| Message-ID: | 49899291.3030303@krap.dk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rick Vernam wrote:
>> The reference documentation is *always* intended to be more complete and
>> more authoritative than the narrative description. If you don't think
>> so then you need to readjust your expectations.
> very well, I did not know that.
> expectations readjusted. thanks.
Me neither. I wonder how many other long term users (I have used pgsql
for more than a decade - 6.2 was my first version if memory serves)
and have never caught that nuance either.
Maybe that should be printed as a note on the "narrative description
pages".. something like: "Note this is a simplified introduction to
the subject. For authorative description please see topic x in section
y (and link to it of course ;))
Svenne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkmJkpEACgkQPPDUIBpvWQsY2ACdG3y9Ho2vW3z2OKePTy9jCkAq
QqEAnAn9J+ZOnAsohnPqbGCtLbfC6e7G
=FiGn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-02-04 13:25:31 | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-02-04 11:35:19 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |