Re: parallel restore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-02-02 18:21:52
Message-ID: 498739C0.1030706@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> I'm almost done reviewing the patch, and will send along an updated
>> version shortly.
>>
>
> And here 'tis.

Many many thanks. Your edits look very sensible, as always.

> I didn't commit because I have no way to test whether
> I broke the Windows code path. Please test, and commit if OK.
>

Will do.
> There is an unfinished TODO item here: we really ought to make it work
> for tar-format archives. That's probably not hugely difficult, but
> I didn't look into it, and don't think we should hold up applying the
> existing patch for it.
>
>
>

Right. Were you thinking this should be done for 8.4?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-02 18:25:42 Re: parallel restore
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-02 18:17:35 Re: LIMIT NULL