| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: adding stuff to parser, question |
| Date: | 2009-02-01 02:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | 49850BE4.1070607@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2009, at 17:22, David Fetter wrote:
>>
>> Is this part of the SQL:2008? If not, is there something else that
>> is?
>
> As far as I can see in the 'free' draft, no. Which is quite funny, cos
> 'DATABASE' keyword isn't there too..
> Anyway. Looks like m$'s sybase clone got it, so I figure - at least
> some ppl figured it would be a nice feature ;)
The standard doesn't have the concept of a database. In Postgres, a
database is essentially the same as the standard's concept of a catalog.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-02-01 02:46:03 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2009-02-01 02:40:09 | Re: pgevent warnings on mingw |