Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-30 17:06:50
Message-ID: 498333AA.3010501@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> * Difficult to trace nested things, e.g., nested PL/pgSQL calls,
> cascaded foreign key actions.

+1

That's a really good point. It'd be particularly nice to have some way
to get EXPLAIN ANALYZE to report on details of the execution of called
SQL functions.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2009-01-30 17:20:37 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-01-30 17:02:09 Re: Pet Peeves?