Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Terry Fielder <terry(at)ashtonwoodshomes(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 16:34:24
Message-ID: 4981DA90.6040002@ashtonwoodshomes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I have 2, closely related:

1) if I have multiple pids running queries, say all selects, I have no
idea which pid is running which query

and that ties to:
2) If I try to kill 1 postgres pid (e.g. to abort a bad query), the
whole backend shuts down and rolls back.
Can we get a way to look at and then kill a specific bad query?

Maybe this is not missing functionality, it can do it and I just don't
know how. Anybody want to wisen me up? :)

Terry

Terry Fielder
terry(at)greatgulfhomes(dot)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
Fax: (416) 441-9085

Gregory Stark wrote:
> I'm putting together a talk on "PostgreSQL Pet Peeves" for discussion at
> FOSDEM 2009 this year. I have a pretty good idea what some them are of course,
> but I would be interested to hear if people have any complaints from personal
> experience. What would be most interesting is if you can explain an example of
> when the problem caused real inconvenience to you, since sometimes it's hard
> to see from a theoretical description where the real harm lies.
>
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?
>
> Feel free to respond on-list or if you prefer in personal emails. I do intend
> to use the ideas you give in my presentation so mark anything you wouldn't be
> happy to see in a slide at a conference some day.
>
>

In response to

  • Pet Peeves? at 2009-01-29 13:16:17 from Gregory Stark

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2009-01-29 16:44:12 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Gerhard Wiesinger 2009-01-29 16:31:07 Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?