Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Date: 2009-01-26 15:20:55
Message-ID: 497D8077.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Still, I agree that if there's anything we should be putting our
> effort into as a community right now, it's this feature. If we got
> Hot Standby in the next release and everything else in the
CommitFest
> got bumped, I think a lot of people would consider that a good trade

Based on discussions at Milwaukee BarCamp, improvements in replication
would do more to break down barriers to migration to PostgreSQL than
anything else.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-01-26 15:24:38 Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-01-26 15:15:01 Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)