From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Date: | 2009-01-26 15:20:55 |
Message-ID: | 497D8077.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Still, I agree that if there's anything we should be putting our
> effort into as a community right now, it's this feature. If we got
> Hot Standby in the next release and everything else in the
CommitFest
> got bumped, I think a lot of people would consider that a good trade
Based on discussions at Milwaukee BarCamp, improvements in replication
would do more to break down barriers to migration to PostgreSQL than
anything else.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-01-26 15:24:38 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-26 15:15:01 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |