From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Klaus" <rklaus(at)nexgenwireless(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cleanup of pgsql_tmp directory |
Date: | 2013-02-05 18:06:38 |
Message-ID: | 4978.1360087598@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Robert Klaus" <rklaus(at)nexgenwireless(dot)com> writes:
> This morning we found out that our filesystem was at 98% and filling
> quickly. We immediately found one query running for a long time and saw
> 1500+ files in the pgsql_tmp directory we could attribute to it.
> I killed using pg_terminate_backend and some space was reclaimed, but the
> temporary files from the process are still in the pgsql_tmp directory.
Temp files should be deleted during proc_exit processing. You're sure
you used pg_terminate_backend() and not something more aggressive? Are
you sure these files actually belong to the process you killed?
> We're on postgres 8.4.9 on centos. Which process should be deleting these
> files and what is normally the delay? I'm assuming the postmaster process
> will eventually delete them, but does the server have to be bounced in order
> for this to happen? It's been 30 minutes since the process was killed.
If a process failed to remove its own temp files for some reason,
there's no other mechanism for getting rid of them, except that a
postmaster restart will run around and clean out all the temp
directories.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Klaus | 2013-02-05 18:35:22 | Re: cleanup of pgsql_tmp directory |
Previous Message | ROBERT KLAUS | 2013-02-05 17:52:36 | cleanup of pgsql_tmp directory |