Re: 9.0 ?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info
Subject: Re: 9.0 ?
Date: 2009-01-21 01:11:46
Message-ID: 49767652.2080409@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Dawid,

> Major version bump serves not only as a PR statement. It is also
> 'early warning' indicator -- "Hey, we've changed so much stuff / added
> so many new features so you'd better be careful.". And I would think
> we owe it to users. :-)

Yes. Speaking entirely for myself, it's possible that we'll start using
the first digit to indicate file format changes which make in-place
upgrade impossible.

--Josh

In response to

  • Re: 9.0 ? at 2009-01-19 11:39:40 from Dawid Kuroczko

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message decibel 2009-01-21 02:37:10 Re: Can someone help with analyst update?
Previous Message Dawid Kuroczko 2009-01-19 11:39:40 Re: 9.0 ?