Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)
Date: 2009-01-19 10:50:47
Message-ID: 49745B07.7060005@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> One of us needs a coffee.

Clearly, I put the kettle on...

> How does Transaction 4 have a RecentGlobalXmin of 2 in step (7), but at
> step (9) the value of RecentGlobalXmin has gone backwards?

Looks like I mixed up the xids of the two transactions in steps 8 and 9.
Let's see if I got it right this time:

1. Transaction 1 begins in backend A
2. Transaction 2 begins in backend B, xmin = 1
3. Transaction 1 ends
4. Transaction 3 begins in backend C, xmin = 2
5. Backend C gets snapshot, TransactionXmin = 2, RecentGlobalXmin = 1
6. Transaction 2 ends.
7. Transaction 4 begins in backend A, gets snapshot TransactionXmin = 2,
RecentGlobalXmin = 2
8. Transaction 4 kills tuple, using its RecentGlobalxmin of 2
9. Transaction 3 splits the page, emits a delete xlog record, setting
latestRemovedXid to its RecentGlobalXmin of 1

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-19 11:14:55 Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-19 10:45:52 Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)