From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Egon Kocjan <ekocjan(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13594: pg_ctl.exe redirects stderr to Windows Events Log if stderr is redirected to pipe |
Date: | 2016-01-08 06:02:04 |
Message-ID: | 4974.1452232924@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> brolga is still unhappy:
> ... Now, backbranches are proving that compiling pg_ctl.c with those
> routines copied in it actually works fine, so based on my limited time
> for the next couple of days, it may be better to just revert the patch
> entirely on HEAD and apply what has been pushed into back branches to
> stabilize the buildfarm, this will address the bug entirely. And it is
> no good to keep the buildfarm red for long,
Hm, narwhal just reported in green, which I was not expecting, and so did
frogmouth. So brolga seems like an outlier. I think reverting might be
an overreaction. At this point the question is more like "how is brolga
different from the other non-MSVC Windows critters?". Perhaps Andrew
can offer some insight.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-08 07:11:12 | Re: BUG #13594: pg_ctl.exe redirects stderr to Windows Events Log if stderr is redirected to pipe |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-08 03:08:40 | Re: BUG #13594: pg_ctl.exe redirects stderr to Windows Events Log if stderr is redirected to pipe |