From: | Vlastimil Havranek <vlastimil(dot)havranek(at)xitee(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with committing in XA mode |
Date: | 2009-01-16 15:35:30 |
Message-ID: | 4970A942.9020502@xitee.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi,
regarding the autocommit, we do not use it in our application, we use
the EJBs mostly with CMP, some with BMP, which are accessing several dbs
via XA driver.
The EJB on which it gets stuck runs with CMP.
Ive found that weblogic provides some monitoring of tx, the tx was there
in state 'comitting' but both force local and force global commit failed
with xaexception: someDataSource: null.
Ive tried all the XA related data source settings, but it didnt help.
So maybe if you could modify the driver to tolerate the strange WL XA
pattern, then I would try that one out.
Anyway, thx for your great cooperation,
Vlastimil Havranek
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Vlastimil Havranek wrote:
>> yes the log_min_messages is set to notice. I've just rechecked it.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> One theory is that WebLogic, or your application code, is calling
> setAutoCommit on the XA connection. I can reproduce a similar error
> with a stand-alone test case by doing that:
>
> XAConnection xaconn1 = ds.getXAConnection();
> XAResource xares1 = xaconn1.getXAResource();
> Connection conn1 = xaconn1.getConnection();
>
> xares1.start(initxid, XAResource.TMNOFLAGS);
> Statement stmt = conn1.createStatement();
> stmt.executeUpdate("INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1234)");
> // 1. conn1.setAutoCommit(true);
> xares1.end(initxid, XAResource.TMSUCCESS);
> // 2. conn1.setAutoCommit(true);
> xares1.prepare(initxid);
> xares1.commit(initxid, false);
>
> Uncommenting either of the commented lines will cause a similar error
> as you're seeing. Since the end() call is made by WebLogic, the 1st
> case would be an explicit setAutoCommit call in your application. You
> don't have one, do you? That's forbidden by the JTA spec.
>
> The 2nd call would be a call made by WebLogic. We've seen WebLogic do
> strange call patterns before (see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2006-10/msg00011.php) so I
> wouldn't be surprised if it was doing that. It's allowed by the JTA
> spec, but not by the PostgreSQL driver because we don't support
> transaction interleaving. We could try modifying the driver to
> tolerate it like the aforementioned "end then join" case, by not
> passing the setAutoCommit call immediately to the underlying
> connection object, but delay it until prepare-call. Whether that would
> work depends on what else the application server is trying to do with
> the connection between end and prepare.
>
> Calling commit or rollback at those points will also trigger the same
> error. JTA spec also forbids setSavePoint, but I'm not sure if that
> would actually be a problem for PostgreSQL.
>
> There's some options in WebLogic to dumb-down the interaction with the
> JDBC XA driver, see
> http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs100/ConsoleHelp/pagehelp/JDBCjdbcdatasourcesjdbcdatasourceconfigtransactiontitle.html.
> At least "Keep Connection Open On Release" is required for PostgreSQL
> driver, and setting the other settings marked with "Use this setting
> to work around specific problems with JDBC XA drivers" might help too.
> Please make sure you have those set.
>
>
> Now, it would be very good if we threw an error immediately at the
> offending call, regardless of whether it's allowed by JTA or not. I've
> been trying to figure out how to do that. We could create a proxy for
> the Connection object handed to the application in PGXAConnection, and
> throw an error if you call one of those functions while an
> XA-transaction is open. That would be fairly simple, but wouldn't
> catch the pattern:
>
> start(xid)
> // do stuff in XA transaction
> executeUpdate("UPDATE ...");
> end(xid)
> // do stuff outside the XA transaction
> executeUpdate("UPDATE ...");
> prepare(xid);
>
> It would be better than nothing, but it would be even better if we
> could catch all the cases we can't handle properly. If we could inject
> a proxy to check that at lower level, around QueryExecutor, it would
> be more robust, but I don't see any easy way to do that.
>
>
> Another check that we really ought to do is to check the command tag
> that PREPARE TRANSACTION returns. If it returns ROLLBACK, the driver
> should throw an error. I'll write a patch for that.
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Vlastimil Havránek
Software Developer
xitee k.s. || www.xitee.com || vlastimil(dot)havranek(at)xitee(dot)com
Phone: office +420 234262342, mobile +420 775366990
-------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miłosz Tylenda | 2009-01-19 15:35:11 | Re: Support of getting generated keys in driver version 8.4devel |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-16 12:10:33 | Re: Problem with committing in XA mode |