| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-15 22:32:26 |
| Message-ID: | 496FB97A.5040500@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> Well, maybe we do need to go with the \df \dfS \dfU approach.
> But I'm still convinced that setting things up so that it's impossible
> to search both classes of functions together is a seriously bad idea.
Agreed -- there are times I *want* to search the system functions, and
for less-trained users they might not know the difference between UDFs
and builtin functions, especially if they've loaded a few contrib modules.
Personally, I don't care that much about what Hungarian Notation we use,
as long as we try to make it consistent with \dt, \dv, \dn etc. My main
objection to requiring \dfU to get only user functions is that it's not
what we do with \dt.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-15 22:49:09 | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Previous Message | Justin Pasher | 2009-01-15 22:30:01 | Re: Autovacuum daemon terminated by signal 11 |