| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Date: | 2009-01-12 18:43:23 |
| Message-ID: | 496B8F4B.7020301@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> git IS a stable archive of what the patches really were.
No. A developer can delete, move and rebase branches in his own
repository as he likes, and all of those operations "modify history". In
fact, a developer can completely destroy or take offline his published
repository. It's *not* an archive.
There's other reasons why I like git very much over cvs, but archiving
is not one of them.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-01-12 18:45:40 | Re: [BUGS] Status of issue 4593 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-12 18:41:52 | Re: Recovery Test Framework |