Re: Recovery Test Framework

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recovery Test Framework
Date: 2009-01-12 15:30:00
Message-ID: 496B61F8.9040200@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (And for the record,
>> there is nothing I like even a little bit about the practice of posting
>> a URL instead of an actual patch.)
>
> I don't like it either.
>
> The patchsets are too big to post to the list directly, at least that is
> the reason in my case and with Fujii-san and KaiGai's cases.

yeah - afaik we still have a 100k limit on -hackers.

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2009-01-12 15:37:30 Re: Recovery Test Framework
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-12 15:21:25 Re: Recovery Test Framework