| From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Date: | 2009-01-09 16:15:28 |
| Message-ID: | 49677820.9010502@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
D'Arcy J.M. Cain a écrit :
>
> As Tom has pointed out, ReST has problems beyond our implementation.
> People who use it are aware of these warts. Given that I really think
> that the cleanest solution is to just give them "border 3", don't
> mention ReST in the docs and have it happily work for 95% of the cases
> in a ReST processor.
+1
>
> How about my other proposal under the "Output filter for psql"
> subject? That would let people create parsers as safe as they need
> them. I think that this proposal is still useful for those that need
> something quick and dirty though.
>
Can be interesting, but for my own usage "border=3" will be enough.
- --
Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklneBwACgkQo/dppWjpEvxucQCeIuTatyfoEw/TkqAVLK/hI0wq
WkIAn3mt4tnMz3BAjXIJqtmMlj9d4r4l
=Ykl+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-09 16:20:40 | Re: SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-09 16:15:08 | Re: Improving compressibility of WAL files |