Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?
Date: 2009-01-07 18:40:01
Message-ID: 4964F701.1080402@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> Hm, how about just 'partition'? Your argument is fair, and another
> point in its favor is that someday we'll probably have an explicit
> notion of partitioned tables and both the inheritance and union-view
> approaches would become legacy methods. We'd certainly want constraint
> exclusion to apply to all three by default.

I think that's probably the best compromise.

--Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT 2009-01-07 18:42:40 Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-07 18:36:35 Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?