| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed |
| Date: | 2010-08-13 18:43:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4963.1281725019@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/08/10 21:27, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes. Mike, are you expecting to submit a new version before the end of
>> the week?
> Yes and here it is, apologies for the delay. I have re-implemented
> xml_is_well_formed such that it is sensitive to the XMLOPTION. The
> additional _document and _content methods are now present. Tests and
> documentation adjusted to suit.
Applied with minor cleanups, mostly in the documentation. The only
thing that seems worth remarking on is that since xml_is_well_formed
now depends on a GUC variable, it *cannot* be marked IMMUTABLE. The
right marking in such cases is STABLE.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-13 19:15:21 | Re: WIP partial replication patch |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-08-13 18:31:17 | WIP partial replication patch |