Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date: 2018-01-29 16:23:24
Message-ID: 495e24a5-d5bf-3ef2-ccdd-dd112c1c3a15@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/29/2018 11:13 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 29 January 2018 at 15:44, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh, if we know we are going to get question on this, the patch had
>> better have an explanation of when to use it. Pushing the problem to
>> later doesn't seem helpful.
>
> What problem are you referring to?
>
> INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE does ...
>
> MERGE allows you to ...
In my reading of Pavel and Bruce, the only 'problem' being suggested
is that the patch hasn't added a bit of documentation somewhere that
lays out the relationship between these two things, more or less as
you just did.

-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-01-29 16:34:48 Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Rick Otten 2018-01-29 16:19:43 dsa_allocate() faliure