From: | Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How are locks managed in PG? |
Date: | 2008-12-22 12:37:34 |
Message-ID: | 494F8A0E.8070900@serioustechnology.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The difference is HE put forth an opinion about the pg developers
>> being smarter, but you put forth what seems like a statement of fact
>> with no evidence to back it up. One is quite subjective and open for
>> debate on both sides, and often to good effect. The other is a
>> statement of fact regarding scalability in apparently all usage
>> circumstances, since it wasn't in any way clarified if you were
>> talking about a narrow usage case or all of the possible and / or
>> probably ones.
>
> Agreed. It's just that, because I know quite a few of the engineers
> working on Oracle and SQL Server, it generally pisses me off to see
> people make blanket statements about one group being smarter than
> another when they probably have no basis for comparison. It's all
> good though, I'm just cranky tonight.
I still haven't seen a post regarding the Oracle scalability issue.
Where is the data??
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2008-12-22 12:49:49 | lack of consequence with domains and types |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2008-12-22 10:44:15 | Re: How are locks managed in PG? |