Re: How are locks managed in PG?

From: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How are locks managed in PG?
Date: 2008-12-22 12:37:34
Message-ID: 494F8A0E.8070900@serioustechnology.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The difference is HE put forth an opinion about the pg developers
>> being smarter, but you put forth what seems like a statement of fact
>> with no evidence to back it up. One is quite subjective and open for
>> debate on both sides, and often to good effect. The other is a
>> statement of fact regarding scalability in apparently all usage
>> circumstances, since it wasn't in any way clarified if you were
>> talking about a narrow usage case or all of the possible and / or
>> probably ones.
>
> Agreed. It's just that, because I know quite a few of the engineers
> working on Oracle and SQL Server, it generally pisses me off to see
> people make blanket statements about one group being smarter than
> another when they probably have no basis for comparison. It's all
> good though, I'm just cranky tonight.

I still haven't seen a post regarding the Oracle scalability issue.
Where is the data??

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2008-12-22 12:49:49 lack of consequence with domains and types
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2008-12-22 10:44:15 Re: How are locks managed in PG?