From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Invalid pages in WAL |
Date: | 2008-12-17 15:12:04 |
Message-ID: | 494916C4.4050801@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've had a private report of these error messages in a test of Hot
> Standby, but IMHO these aren't related to that patch. It seems more
> likely to be related to the new VACUUM code? Certainly hot standby does
> nothing to the normal flow of existing WAL records.
>
> LOG: database system was interrupted; last known up at 2008-12-16
> 12:56:57 EST
> LOG: database system was not properly shut down; automatic recovery in
> progress
> LOG: redo starts at 0/655A68
> LOG: record with zero length at 0/658150
> LOG: redo done at 0/658080
> WARNING: page 35 of relation base/11517/1249 did not exist
> WARNING: page 32 of relation base/11517/1249 did not exist
> WARNING: page 33 of relation base/11517/1249 did not exist
> WARNING: page 34 of relation base/11517/1249 did not exist
> PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages
>
> The WAL record was destroyed before it could be analysed, so we can't do
> much for now.
Hmm, could well be related to the visibility map or FSM. Although those
messages suggest that it's a heap/index page that's missing, not FSM or
VM page. Any idea how to reproduce that?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Pihlak | 2008-12-17 15:17:26 | Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-17 15:07:35 | Invalid pages in WAL |