From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Miroslav Nachev <miro(at)space-comm(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4586: Supporting of Binary instead Bytea for Primary Keys |
Date: | 2008-12-17 09:19:38 |
Message-ID: | 4948C42A.4060309@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
(please keep the mailing list cc'd. (or take this to a more relevant
list, actually)).
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
> Thank you very much. How can I map PostgreSQL UUID to JPA Hibernate with
> annotations? Serializable or BigInteger or byte[] or java.util.UUID?
No idea.
> The big disadvantage of bytea is that it is not possible to use that type in
> indexes and primary keys. Probably this restriction is because is very slow
> column type because instead to keep the data this column keeps pointer to
> the data.
Huh? Of course it's possible:
postgres=# CREATE TABLE foo (id bytea PRIMARY KEY);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
"foo_pkey" for table "foo"
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# CREATE INDEX i_foo ON foo (id);
CREATE INDEX
postgres=#
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miroslav Nachev | 2008-12-17 09:36:08 | Re: BUG #4586: Supporting of Binary instead Bytea for Primary Keys |
Previous Message | Miroslav Nachev | 2008-12-17 09:14:29 | Re: BUG #4586: Supporting of Binary instead Bytea for Primary Keys |