Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle

From: justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Date: 2008-12-15 01:38:03
Message-ID: 4945B4FB.3020504@emproshunts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Not, on TPC-E on the other hand, Oracle is way ahead of us ... we were
> like 50% last I checked, due mostly to the amount of time it takes us
> to resolve lock conflicts vs. Oracle. Of course, Microsoft is beating
> Oracle by 50%, so Oracle is not the one to match on that benchmark.
>
> --Josh

Here is the current TPC-E top 10
http://www.tpc.org/tpce/results/tpce_perf_results.asp
where is oracle???

TCP-H
http://www.tpc.org/tpch/results/tpch_perf_results.asp

TCP-C
http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_perf_results.asp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-12-15 02:51:04 Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-12-14 19:33:43 Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle