From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Matthias Schmitt <freak002(at)mmp(dot)lu> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Darwin: make check fails with "child process exited with exit code 134" |
Date: | 2013-10-28 16:22:56 |
Message-ID: | 4945.1382977376@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Matthias Schmitt <freak002(at)mmp(dot)lu> writes:
> Application Specific Information:
> detected source and destination buffer overlap
> Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
> 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00007fff93e00866 __pthread_kill + 10
> 1 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fff92c7335c pthread_kill + 92
> 2 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fff8c5a5bba abort + 125
> 3 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fff8c5a5d31 abort_report_np + 181
> 4 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fff8c5c98c5 __chk_fail + 48
> 5 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fff8c5c98d5 __chk_fail_overlap + 16
> 6 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fff8c5c9906 __chk_overlap + 49
> 7 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fff8c5c9a59 __strncpy_chk + 78
> 8 postgres 0x000000010b4c9045 namestrcpy + 86
> 9 postgres 0x000000010b1901f2 TupleDescInitEntry + 99
> 10 postgres 0x000000010b57f53e resolve_polymorphic_tupdesc + 933
Hmm. Well, it's pretty obvious what it's complaining about:
resolve_polymorphic_tupdesc is cheating a bit by telling
TupleDescInitEntry to re-initialize a tupledesc using the name value
that's already in the entry. What I find curious is that I can't
reproduce this problem on an OS X Mavericks machine here. You must
be using some nondefault compiler switches --- care to tell us what?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-10-28 16:26:52 | Re: Darwin: make check fails with "child process exited with exit code 134" |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-10-28 16:11:32 | OSX doesn't accept identical source/target for strcpy() anymore |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-28 16:23:43 | Re: RULE regression test fragility? |
Previous Message | Rodolfo Campero | 2013-10-28 16:22:29 | Re: PL/Python: domain over array support |