Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Date: 2008-12-05 03:50:58
Message-ID: 4938A522.9090205@ak.jp.nec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>>> I don't oppose to elimination of "--disable-row-acl" options, however,
>>>> it is not clear for me whether it should be unavoidable selection in
>>>> the future, or not.
>>> Look at the existing configure options; we don't remove features via
>>> configure unless it is for some platform-specific reason. Please remove
>>> the configure option and make it always enabled.
>> OK, I'll update it in the next patch set.
>
> Good. I assume the SQL-row security patch is not testable alone with
> out the rest of the patches, right?

The minimum requirements are the 1st and 2nd patches.
The first provides security hooks to PostgreSQL server program, and
the other provides ones to pg_dump command.
The 3rd, 4th and 5th are not necessary for the test purpose.

Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-12-05 03:52:22 Re: In-place upgrade: catalog side
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2008-12-05 03:43:58 Re: portability of "designated initializers"