From: | Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: return MAX and when it happened]] |
Date: | 2008-11-24 14:41:10 |
Message-ID: | 492ABD06.5030407@yahoo.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't understand: is my question not clear, stupid, or you guys just
don't like me? ;)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [GENERAL] return MAX and when it happened]
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:48:44 -0600
From: Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
To: postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Can someone answer me? Or do I have to ask this in the hackers list?
I don't get from the docs: do I have to call
get_call_result_type(fcinfo, NULL, &tupdesc)
every time?
I mean: the only example I've found about returning Composite Types
talks about returning sets as well (34.9.10. Returning Sets). In that
example the get_call_result_type call is done once:
if (SRF_IS_FIRSTCALL())
{
[...]
if (get_call_result_type(fcinfo, NULL, &tupdesc) != TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE)
[...]
}
Should I do something like that in my function or that only applies to
function returning sets?
I'm calling it every time now but I don't know if it's right...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2008-11-24 15:02:00 | Re: mail list traffic |
Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2008-11-24 14:19:03 | Re: literal limits in 8.3 |