Re: [Cert] Translations

From: Mario Ruiz <mario(dot)ruiz(at)alerce(dot)com(dot)au>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-es-ayuda <pgsql-es-ayuda(at)postgresql(dot)org>, cert(at)lists(dot)postgresqlcertification(dot)org, Santiago Zarate <santiago(at)zarate(dot)net(dot)ve>
Subject: Re: [Cert] Translations
Date: 2008-11-24 12:42:11
Message-ID: 492AA123.7080103@alerce.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-es-ayuda

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't have a strong view on which way is better, and I can see both
side of the argument. Probably some flexibility will be required in
moving forward.

In your opinion, how difficult would it be to change course if the
chosen way proves hard or unworkable?

Regards,

Mario

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
| On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 18:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
|> Mario Ruiz escribió:
|>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>> Hash: SHA1
|>>
|>>
|>> Happy to help anytime, Espanol/Ingles/Castellano.
|>>
|>> We can quickly establish a team and get going.
|> I keep wondering if we're doing things right on this front. We have a
|> team working on error message translation. We have another team working
|> on Win32 installer translation. Another one for phpPgAdmin. Another
|> one for pgAdmin. Now there's a translation team for the certification
|> stuff.
|>
|> Shouldn't we try to unite efforts?
|
| I would say, "Absolutely" but... Isn't a certification a bit of a
| different beast. The questions (I think, maybe not) should be kept
| closed to the breast.
|
|> Now I know that some people will say to me: "you're wrong to try to mix
|> groups, because the current situation is working fine!" But I disagree
|> that it works fine; I have never heard from the phpPgAdmin translators
|> or the pgAdmin translators. Are we all being consistent with the
|> terminology, for example?
|
| Oh I agree with this. I think generally speaking you are right on with
| the idea of getting everyone together like that.
|
|> Maybe the certification group is OK to be separate because the task is
|> so obviously different, but what about the others?
|
| Right. I think taking half a dozen of the "core" PostgreSQL + projects
| (like PgAdmin etc..) and making running it as a team would be a great
| idea.
|
| SIncerely,
|
| Joshua D. Drake
|
|

- --
Mario Ruiz
Alerce Software Pty
Level 1, 26 Gardeners Rd
Kingsford, NSW 2032
Phone: 02-9663-4033
Mobile: 0408-103-366
Email: mario(dot)ruiz(at)alerce(dot)com(dot)au
http://www.alerce.com.au/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkqoSMACgkQj0FL+8hoA2OBpwCfU2HkycJxOtOeGCg5w9bbSALU
AsMAoJxUlksqk/8AkWmVQU7b1otBYPoN
=d2BU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-es-ayuda by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pablo E. Siciliano 2008-11-24 12:50:28 Re: PG Day
Previous Message Mario Ruiz 2008-11-24 11:20:10 Re: [Cert] Translations