Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Date: 2008-11-22 14:23:08
Message-ID: 492815CC.2090802@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ron Mayer wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:18 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
>>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>> ... harder to keep
>>>>>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>>>>>> volume count doesn't capture.
>>>> If measured in "bytes of the gzipped mbox" it ...
>>> Its because we eliminated the -patches mailing list.
>> That's part of it. I've added -patches to the graph at
>> http://0ape.com/postgres_mailinglist_size/ as well as
>> a graph of hackers+patches combined; and it still looks
>> like hackers+patches is quite high in the past 3 months.
>>
>> With hackers+patches it looks like 2002-08 was the biggest
>> month; but the past 3 months still look roughly twice
>> late 2007's numbers.
>
> Can someoone graph CVS traffic, showing the historical number of commits
> and number of changed lines?

Ohloh has some graphs, are they detailed enough?
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/postgres/analyses/latest

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ciprian Dorin Craciun 2008-11-22 15:16:16 Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-11-22 12:53:38 Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time