From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |
Date: | 2008-11-22 14:23:08 |
Message-ID: | 492815CC.2090802@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ron Mayer wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:18 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
>>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>> ... harder to keep
>>>>>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>>>>>> volume count doesn't capture.
>>>> If measured in "bytes of the gzipped mbox" it ...
>>> Its because we eliminated the -patches mailing list.
>> That's part of it. I've added -patches to the graph at
>> http://0ape.com/postgres_mailinglist_size/ as well as
>> a graph of hackers+patches combined; and it still looks
>> like hackers+patches is quite high in the past 3 months.
>>
>> With hackers+patches it looks like 2002-08 was the biggest
>> month; but the past 3 months still look roughly twice
>> late 2007's numbers.
>
> Can someoone graph CVS traffic, showing the historical number of commits
> and number of changed lines?
Ohloh has some graphs, are they detailed enough?
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/postgres/analyses/latest
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ciprian Dorin Craciun | 2008-11-22 15:16:16 | Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-11-22 12:53:38 | Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |