| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowley(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Gregory Stark' <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, 'Postgres' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cool hack with recursive queries |
| Date: | 2008-11-22 09:00:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4927CA16.70103@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:06:13PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>> I takes 2.6 second on my laptop. I think it is not so bad.
>
>> About 2.0 on my OS/X laptop. Could this be a problem on whatever
>> architecture/OS/compiler combo you have?
>
> Not everyone is using fast new laptops.
>
> This is a cool hack, agreed, but that doesn't make it a useful
> regression test. Whatever value it might have isn't going to
> repay the community-wide expenditure of cycles.
FWIW:
Time: 46719.632 ms
on my ARM based buildfarm box ...
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-11-22 09:28:52 | Re: How should pg_standby get over the gap of timeline? |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2008-11-22 05:39:03 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1197) |