From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml? |
Date: | 2008-11-21 19:42:36 |
Message-ID: | 49270F2C.90403@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Last I checked, Magnus had promised to come up with suitable
>>> documentation changes for this patch, but then he went off sailing...
>
>> Meh, I seem to have forgotten this one again. Here's a suggestion, seems
>> ok, or were you thinking about something more?
>
> Needs a bit of proofreading but this is more or less what I had in
> mind.
>
>> + Enum settings are specified the same way as string settings, but they
>> + are limited in which strings are accepted. For each setting the available
>> + are listed in <literal>pg_settings.enumvals</>.
>
> IIRC the comparisons are case-insensitive; if so the fact should be
> mentioned here.
Updated, added, and applied.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-21 20:05:07 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning about ignored return value. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-21 19:31:23 | Re: Autoconf, libpq and replacement function |