| From: | Alexandra Nitzschke <an(at)clickware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: could not read block 77 of relation 1663/16385/388818775 |
| Date: | 2008-11-21 18:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | 4926FBC0.5070506@clickware.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Yes, its a btree.
Tom Lane schrieb:
> Alexandra Nitzschke <an(at)clickware(dot)de> writes:
>> We have had a look at the /var/log files, no system crash, kernel panic or messages like this has happened.
>
> What this smells like is a failed page split --- somewhere in the index
> there is a down-link pointing at page 77, but page 77 didn't actually
> get added to the file.
>
> If there was no system crash or hardware misfeasance then that'd
> represent a Postgres bug, but it's difficult to do much about it
> unless you can come up with a reproducible sequence to trigger the bug.
>
> (Also, since you didn't mention otherwise, I assume this is a btree
> index?)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-21 18:26:02 | Re: could not read block 77 of relation 1663/16385/388818775 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-21 18:17:43 | Re: executing SELECT xmlelement(name foo); causes "server closed the connection unexpectedly" Error |