| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |
| Date: | 2008-11-21 17:48:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4926F465.1030307@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>> volume count doesn't capture.
>
> I am still relatively new to Postgres, but my impression is that the questions
> have gotten harder/more in depth. Fewer, How do you pronounce Postgres? and
> more, Explain the various isolation levels for transactions and how does that
> affect my particular situation?
This is definitely the case. Whether it's because the documentation is
better, or we're getting a more sophisticated user the questions are
certainly more involved.
Some of the EXPLAINs on the performance list are practically impossible
to read unless you've got the time to cut+paste and fix line-endings.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ciprian Dorin Craciun | 2008-11-21 17:58:29 | Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings |
| Previous Message | Daniel Verite | 2008-11-21 17:47:03 | Re: Prepared statement already exists |