| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |
| Date: | 2008-11-21 17:18:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4926ED7D.4030402@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:18 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> ... harder to keep
>>>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>>>> volume count doesn't capture.
>> If measured in "bytes of the gzipped mbox" it ...
>
> Its because we eliminated the -patches mailing list.
That's part of it. I've added -patches to the graph at
http://0ape.com/postgres_mailinglist_size/ as well as
a graph of hackers+patches combined; and it still looks
like hackers+patches is quite high in the past 3 months.
With hackers+patches it looks like 2002-08 was the biggest
month; but the past 3 months still look roughly twice
late 2007's numbers.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-21 17:29:06 | Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-21 17:12:07 | Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings |