From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time |
Date: | 2008-11-21 09:22:12 |
Message-ID: | 49267DC4.2070503@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant
>>>> since 2000. Not the result I expected.
>>> I also was confused by its flatness. I am finding the email traffic
>>> almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is
>>> happening, but it seems it is not volume-related.
>> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>> volume count doesn't capture.
>>
>> Does anyone have the data to break it down per mailing list? That might
>> yield some more insight.
>
> Here's a graph of the more popular mailinglists (I couldn't include all
> - the graph was completely unreadable) as seen in the archives search db.
Pfft, -general didn't like that file even though it was only 60k or so.
Here's a link to an uploaded version:
http://www.smugmug.com/photos/421507651_8pe6C-O.png
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2008-11-21 09:49:37 | Re: transaction isolation level in plpgsql function |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-11-21 09:20:58 | Re: transaction isolation level in plpgsql function |