Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: How to deal with toast
Date: 2008-11-20 09:29:04
Message-ID: 49252DE0.6070204@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> The question is if we should do toast modification now to avoid
> potential future problems or if we will solve it when any on-disk format
> change requires it?

Perhaps we should just add the new attid attribute to the toast table,
but mark it as nullable? We wouldn't need to fill it in in the 8.3->8.4
conversion but new tuples would include it.

In the future release that we actually need it, we'll make it
non-nullable, and write a pre-upgrade script to retoast tuples that
don't have it yet.

Hmm. That would change TOAST_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE, though.

> I prefer do it now, because there could be small risk that it will not
> possible to do it in the future. When in-place upgrade will be
> implemented nobody will want to perform backup/restore.

I feel we should avoid doing anything extra, risking that we get nothing
finished.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-11-20 09:31:40 Re: HEAD build failure on win32 mingw
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-11-20 09:22:23 Re: Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan